Zero Retries 0092
2023-03-31 - Amateur Radio and the Big Disruption, Linux Packet Node, Talkpod A36Plus 7 band portable radio
Zero Retries is an independent newsletter about technological innovation in Amateur Radio. Zero Retries promotes Amateur Radio as (literally) a license to experiment with radio technology.
About Zero Retries
Steve Stroh N8GNJ, Editor
Jack Stroh, Late Night Assistant Editor Emeritus
In this issue:
Request To Send
BEACON Edition well received
My experiment in Zero Retries 0091 to publish a second edition of Zero Retries - the BEACON Edition (The Quick Mentions Edition of Zero Retries) seemed a success. Of the 17 votes (out of 750+ readers), 65% voted “Love the idea”. Good enough for now.
N2RJ Has Resigned as Hudson Division Director (and ARRL Board)
Regarding the discussion of Ria Jairam N2RJ being sanctioned by the ARRL Board (Request to Send in Zero Retries 0082 and Zero Retries 0083), it’s noteworthy that N2RJ has now resigned as Director of ARRL’s Hudson Division. I said previously:
In the end, the fallout of that bad decision is going to hurt ARRL. Perhaps it will hurt minimally, or it may hurt severely - too soon to tell. The ARRL Board is on the wrong side of history on this issue - it's being hyper protective and insular when it should be looking at the bigger picture.
ARRL CEO David Minster N2AA espouses rhetoric about building diversity:
To change the look of amateur radio from a diversity perspective will take many years. Focusing — seriously focusing — on youth programs and STEM education outreach today is the only realistic future for amateur radio to replace the tens of thousands of hams who will leave the hobby in the coming decade.
In talking to younger folks, a primary thing they’ve told me is that they just don’t “see themselves represented” in Amateur Radio. What they do see, especially in ARRL and especially in ARRL leadership is mostly not young, mostly male, not much racial diversity, etc. ARRL will have a hard time in their recruitment of youth and “STEM education outreach” if those youth being recruited don’t “see themselves represented”.
Thus, in my opinion, the resignation of N2RJ from ARRL leadership is a significant loss to ARRL as a whole and its leadership in particular, because seeing N2RJ in a leadership role at the ARRL did provide some of that needed “see themselves represented”.
Now they won’t.
de Steve Stroh N8GNJ
Amateur Radio and the Big Disruption
By Steve Stroh N8GNJ
Amateur Radio Emergency Communications… and emergency communications in general, operate under the assumption that a communications emergency occurs when normal communications infrastructure is damaged or overwhelmed. Examples are hurricanes, floods, wildfires, etc. It’s further assumed that with planning and preparation such as building Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs), communivations vehicles, trained professionals and volunteers, hardened emergency communications facilities, reservoir of emergency equipment, etc. that emergency communications can be maintained.
But what if those assumptions aren’t valid? What if a disaster occurred that completely disrupted the telecommunication infrastructure we depend on - multiple systems simultaneously disrupted?
The following is purely a thought experiment… at the moment.
My news sources are eclectic and varied. I’ve been graciously included in three “communities of thought” where I’m usually the dumbest person in the conversation. Thus, mostly I read and learn. Over the decades, I’ve seen these communities (collectively) offer perspectives and predictions that have often turned out to be prescient. Having “proven themselves” (to me, anyway), I’ve come to pay attention when these communities of thought start highlighting worrisome trends.
One such trend that’s been discussed lately is anticipating “the next big one”. Not a natural disaster, not a major economic downturn but an event that would affect multiple major infrastructure in the US, simultaneously. Just imagine the impact of an event that shuts down…
A mobile telephone network (example, T-Mobile),
A major Internet Service Provider (example, Comcast),
A primary telephone network that provides E911 services (example, CenturyLink),
A major credit card company (example, Mastercard),
A major cloud services provider (example, Google Gmail),
A VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal) satellite services operator (example, gas stations verify gas purchases via satellite to authorize a gas pump to dispense gas),
An airline’s reservation / scheduling system goes offline (example, Southwest),
A major city’s traffic coordination system that dynamically sequences traffic lights (example, New York City).
A petroleum pipeline company whose pipeline monitoring system goes offline and thus has to shut down the pipeline (example, Columbia Gas).
A major power grid goes down for hours… or days… (example, New York City blackout, Texas ice storm).
The above doesn’t factor in the second-order effects; for example, the Texas power grid not only affected electrical power, but disrupted food distribution (grocery stores couldn’t operate), credit cards couldn’t be used, gas stations (generally) could not pump and sell gas, etc.
What’s really sobering in the above scenarios is that each of these disruptions has happened… just (fortunately) not all at once. Some of those scenarios have happened multiple times.
The above scenario also doesn’t factor in the possibility that not just “A” segment of communications infrastructure gets shut down, or smaller combinations get shut down.
What… if it all… gets shut down? As in:
All mobile telephone networks,
All major Internet Service Providers,
All primary telephone networks that provide E911 services,
Insane? Unimaginable? Impossible? Just cannot happen?
I posit that it such a scenario is sane, is imaginable, is possible, and could happen.
In discussing the following scenarios, I’m not giving over Zero Retries to doomsday scenarios / apocalyptic justifications for “prepping”, etc. Outlining these scenarios - briefly, incompletely, and perhaps inaccurately, is merely scene-setting for the primary discussion about how Amateur Radio could be part of the solution.
Scenario 1 - Overwhelming cyberattack.
We in the US are wholly dependent on our telecommunications infrastructure. Many of us don’t even carry any cash - we just have our credit or debit cards (or equivalent on a smartphone) and with the ability to instantly verify validity of the funds in the account, which is very convenient. Very few of us have “landlines” any more, and if we do, they’re probably Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) telephones. Most of us don’t receive paper bills for our services, just email notifications of automatic electronic debits and deposits.
Thus a cyberattack that significantly disrupts the US telecommunications (and other) infrastructure would be devastating. It wouldn’t be a cyber attack… such a massive attack would be a cyber war. All of the cyberattacks to date can (in my opinion) be described as skirmishes, or at most, minor battles - not a cyber war. But cyberwar isn’t a distant possibility- cyber war against the US is, by far, the most likely opening move when China decides it’s time to “take back” Taiwan.
Scenario 2 - Carrington Event Scale Coronal Mass Ejection (CME)
Zero Retries Pseudostaffer Jeff Davis KE9V offers this succinct explanation:
March 24, 2023
A massive eruption of solar material, known as a coronal mass ejection or CME, was detected escaping from the Sun at 11:36 p.m. EDT on March 12, 2023. The CME erupted from the side of the Sun opposite Earth. Fortunately, it wasn’t a replay of the Carrington event of 1859. The eruption was on the opposite side on the Sun, facing away from the earth.
Dodging the Apocalypse by J.R. Dunn
Estimates suggest it was ten to one hundred times more powerful than the 1859 event. Had it been an earth-facing, direct, head-on kill-shot, well, you wouldn’t be reading this.
Scenario 3 - Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) (Nuclear Explosion in Atmosphere)
An enemy attacking the US by causing an EMP is perhaps even likelier than initiating cyber war, and perhaps even more effective. Unlike increasing security on telecommunications infrastructure to reduce the severity of cyberattack / cyberwar, little can be done (with less than military budgets) to protect electronic systems against EMP. Thus an EMP would be devastatingly effective.
In all three scenarios, telecommunications as we (civilians know it) would effectively cease to exist, for a significant period. So, what could Amateur Radio do? We’d like to think that Amateur Radio wouldn’t be much affected by a cyber attack / cyber war… but is that true? Think about how much Amateur Radio has come to rely on Internet access - to manage repeaters and operate repeater networks; operate remote stations when you can’t have antennas on premise, how microwave networks are interconnected with Internet, how a lot of “Amateur Radio” activity is (in reality) VOIP through Internet-connected “Hotspots”, Winlink, Automatic Packet Reporting System (APRS) aggregating to Internet servers and websites, etc.
I take little pleasure in suggesting that, perhaps, Amateur Radio might want to attempt to “live without Internet”to see what that particular worst-case scenario might be like in its roles as "communications of last resort".
But for the CME and EMP scenarios… they’re hard to imagine… but looking backwards in history, sometimes we suffer most precisely from such a failure of imagination about worst-case scenarios. For communications, most of us could be reduced to using to smoke signals, carrier pigeons, or messengers running around with pieces of paper. Almost anything with an antenna, or connected to a power line will be disabled.
Except, perhaps, for the RFBitBanger radio. I confess to being a bit (mentally) dismissive of this project, thinking it was yet another “scratching my itch” low power HF radio project. That is, until I made the connection between the above, and this description of the RFBitBanger:
The RFBitBanger is an off-the-grid QRP radio. It is not just designed to be used off the grid, it is designed to be assembled and maintained off-the-grid. Most radios require specialized parts that would be difficult to obtain in an extreme parts shortage or in remote places. This radio is designed to be assembled and maintained using the most common jellybean components that might be in a hobbyist junkpile. It will mainly support low bandwidth/digital modes to make the most of limited power.
The first prototype of the RFBitBanger transmitting was demo’ed on YouTube a few weeks ago by Paul Williamson KB5MU:
Note that the RFBitBanger is not a voice radio with a modem driving the (audio) input. This prototype supports only data, though there is a reference to potentially supporting voice (Single Sideband - SSB). The built-in data modes include Continuous Wave (CW), Radio Teletype (RTTY), and SCAMP - a new mode which includes Frequency Shift Keybing (FSK) and On / Off Keying (OOK). SCAMP implements Forward Error Correction (FEC).
The RFBitBanger uses a keyboard with a PS/2 interface as the input device; I’ll guess the PS/2 interface is simply easier to interface with a simple microcontroller.
I’m not highlighting the RFBitBanger as the ultimate “Post Carrington” radio… but the design choices for it are something to think about. It certainly has me thinking.
Putting aside our cynicism about the future of Amateur Radio…
I’m probably more guilty than most of being cynical about the future of Amateur Radio in providing emergency communications. I’m seeing more and more stories about emergency services providers quietly saying “Thanks, but no thanks” to Amateur Radio involvement. I continue to feel that my cynicism is valid in the “Edge of the Disaster” scenarios that are typical now, given that Iridium, FirstNET, and Starlink are now able to quickly provide tactical voice, data, and Internet into disaster zones.
But the phrase When All Else Failsassumes new meaning when those three scenarios are seriously considered. When all... literally… all... else fails, hopefully Amateur Radio will be usable because some of our best and brightest thought through those unimaginable scenarios and were ready with modest systems with no external dependencies, and people with training, that can function when we need them the most.
Building a Linux Packet Node (YouTube)
By Steve Stroh N8GNJ
Though this video is now one year old, all the observations Jim Beno K2YE offers about building a first generation, and then second generation multiport, multi-radio Packet Radio node are still valid. While a Packet Radio digipeater can be as simple as a KPC-3+ and a radio, usually one wants to do more than simple digipeating. At that point, things get a bit complicated and one ends up launching a treasure hunt
There was a funny moment (approx. 31:33) when K2YE struggled to explain what the “J” in JNOS represented. The origin story of JNOS is often lost to history now, but JNOS was created by Johannes Reinalda WG7J, who became a minor hero to the TCP/IP experimenters in the Seattle area.
Network Operating System - NOS (which JNOS was based on) was created by Phil Karn KA9Q as a TCP/IP router running on MS-DOS that worked with Ethernet or SLIP (Serial Line Internet Protocol) and Amateur Radio devices such as KISS TNCs, 56k interfaces, etc. KA9Q’s view of networking was “TCP/IP is the answer… what was the question again?”. TCP/IP was exotic technology in the early days of Amateur Radio Packet Radio, so KA9Q created NOS as a demonstration that yes, TCP/IP was feasible to use in Amateur Radio.
In the NOS era, the “Wetnet Mafia” in the Seattle area had set up multiple repeaters (yes, full duplex repeaters) running 9600 bps and doing TCP/IP (over AX.25). We were having a really good time experimenting.
WG7J (a grad student, if memory serves) was a kindred spirit of us TCP/IP experimenters, but lived in the Portland, Oregon area. WG7J wanted to experiment with us, but the only Amateur Radio “infrastructure” available to him was (AX.25) 1200 bps Net/ROM nodes and Bulletin Board Systems.
So, to communicate with us in the Seattle area, WG7J created JNOS by adding the capability to “tunnel” TCP/IP packets through Net/ROM networks, and tunnel Internet style email through BBS systems and BBS forwarding networks.
It was great fun for those of us in the Seattle area to exchange network traffic and email with WG7J. WG7J was a hero to us, and many of us switched to running JNOS - WG7J was a very responsive regarding bug fixes and new features!
Talkpod A36Plus Portable Radio - “7 Bands”
The full product name is Talkpod A36Plus GMRS Amateur Ham Two-Way Radio 512 Channel, 5W, 7-Band Receive With AM AIR VHF UHF. 😉
While the prose is… a bit breathless for the Talkpod A36Plus, it’s “interesting” to see how Chinese manufacturers such as Talkpod continue to blur the lines between various radio services, and how “stuck in the 1970s” US radio regulations are in comparison. For example…
136 - 174 MHz
400 - 512 MHz
(TX is noted as “Locked to Ham”)
76 - 108 MHz (FM Broadcast Radio)
108 - 136 MHz (AM Aircraft)
136 - 180 MHz
230 - 250 MHz
350 - 400 MHz
400 - 512 MHz
700 - 985 MHz
Other than that, the A36Plus is pretty typical, except for the price - $59.00… and the Lime Green color. It’s nice that charging portable radios has now migrated to USB-C.
Radios like the A36Plus just keep coming at us, amazingly inexpensive. At some point, it’s just… ineffective to attempt to maintain regulatory distinctions of different certification / technical requirements of radios for different radio services such as Amateur Radio, General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS), Multiple Use Radio Service (MURS), Family Radio Service (FRS), etc. Trying to maintain those distinctions is increasingly a fool’s errand… akin to shoveling sand against the tide.
In attempting to understand why the FCC simply ignores the blurring of regulatory lines inherent in radios such as the A36Plus, I fall back on a conversation I had a couple of decades ago with a very senior staff member of the FCC. The conversation took place at an industry conference, in a bar, with beers in hand. I asked:
There was a story, on the front page of the Wall Street Journal, about a guy using “Russian Army surplus” antennas connected to Part 15 radios, which, of course, is an “non-certified” combination. (It doesn’t get much more “non-certified” than “Russian Army surplus”). Why didn’t the FCC do something about that blatant disregard of its Part 15 Rules?
The very senior staff member’s answer was succinct:
Simple… no one complained to the FCC!
Despite what is now a polite fiction of regulations and technical requirements, it’s my guess that everyone is enjoying radios like the A36Plus, and no one is complaining to the FCC.
Rob Sipes re: Zero Retries 0091 - I was supposed to Winter-over at Amundsen-Scott, aka South Pole Station back in 1996 after I separated from the Air Force.
Alexander DL4NO re: Zero Retries 0091 - My emergency solar power supply uses 12 V because of my ham radio equipment.
ReadyKilowatt re: Zero Retries 0091 - I replaced my old Goal Zero powerbank with a Ecoflow Delta Max unit with updated solar panels and their generator.
Join the Fun on Amateur Radio
If you’re not yet licensed as an Amateur Radio Operator, and would like to join the fun by literally having a license to experiment with radio technology, check out
Join the Fun on Amateur Radio for some pointers.
Zero Retries Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - In development 2023-02.
Closing the Channel
In its mission to highlight technological innovation in Amateur Radio, promote Amateur Radio to techies as a literal license to experiment with radio technology, and make Amateur Radio more relevant to society in the 2020s and beyond, Zero Retries is published via email and web, and is available to everyone at no cost. Zero Retries is proud not to participate in the Amateur Radio Publishing Industrial Complex, which hides Amateur Radio content behind paywalls.
My ongoing Thanks to:
Tina Stroh KD7WSF for, well, everything!
Pseudostaffers Dan Romanchik KB6NU and Jeff Davis KE9V for continuing to spot, and write about “Zero Retries Interesting” items on their blogs that I don’t spot on my own.
Newsletters that regularly feature Zero Retries Interesting content:
Amateur Radio Weekly by Cale Mooth K4HCK is a weekly anthology of links to interesting Amateur Radio stories.
Experimental Radio News by Bennet Z. Kobb AK4AV discusses (in detail) Experimental (Part 5) licenses issued by the US FCC.
YouTube channels that regularly feature Zero Retries Interesting content:
HB9BLA Wireless by Andreas Spiess HB9BLA
KM6LYW Radio by Craig Lamparter KM6LY (home of the DigiPi project)
Modern Ham by Billy Penley KN4MKB
Tech Minds by Matthew Miller M0DQW
The Substack email publishing platform makes Zero Retries possible. I recommend it for publishing newsletters.
If you’re reading this issue on the web and you’d like to see Zero Retries in your email Inbox every Friday afternoon, just click below to join
100 200 300 400 5 00 600 700+ other readers:
Please tell your friends and co-conspirators about Zero Retries - just click:
Offering feedback or comments for Zero Retries is equally easy - just click:
If you’re a fellow smart person that uses RSS, there is an RSS feed for Zero Retries.
Zero Retries (N8GNJ) is on Mastodon - email@example.com - just click:
Email issues of Zero Retries are “instrumented” by Substack to gather basic statistics about opens, clicking links, etc.
More bits from Steve Stroh N8GNJ:
SuperPacket blog - Discussing new generations of Amateur Radio Data Communications - beyond Packet Radio (a precursor to Zero Retries)
N8GNJ blog - Amateur Radio Station N8GNJ and the mad science experiments at N8GNJ Labs - Bellingham, Washington, USA
Thanks for reading!
Steve Stroh N8GNJ / WRPS598 (He / Him / His)
These bits were handcrafted (by a mere human, not an Artificial Intelligence bot) in beautiful Bellingham (The City of Subdued Excitement), Washington, USA.
If you’d like to reuse an article in this issue, for example for club or other newsletters, just ask. Please provide credit for the content to me and any other authors.
All excerpts from other authors or organizations, including images, are intended to be fair use.
Portions Copyright © 2021, 2022, and 2023 by Steven K. Stroh.
Blanket permission granted for TAPR to use any Steve Stroh content for the TAPR Packet Status Register (PSR) newsletter (I owe them from way back).
I’ve heard this philosophy of emergency communications described as “The edge of the disaster scenario”. As in beyond the edges of the disaster, normal communications infrastructure is working and available. Thus, in this scenario, the job of emergency communications is to bridge from the area where communications infrastructure is damaged into an area where communications infrastructure is functioning normally.
See article by US Naval Institute - U.S. Should Create Military Cyber Force to Help Deter China, Experts Tell Congress.
Gosh help me… Charles Brabbham N5PVL (Silent Keyboard) might have been at least partially right after all.
Which I did not realize is a Registered Trademark of ARRL…
Yet another reason to celebrate Digital Library of Amateur Radio & Communications (DLARC) - despite being long out of print (and unavailable as print-on-demand), books on Packet Radio are available from DLARC.
Emergency communication: I look at the activities of our German society DARC and find large conceptional holes at the very base. This starts with ignoring the personal preparations like supplies for a few days to weeks for every family. Or: How should any alarm or coordination work when standard communication means have broken down? Remember that this is no topic only within the ham radio community: Emergency authorities must be able to easily contact the ham radio groups in a standard way. The central ham radio organization must be able to alarm their people etc. For this for example a JS8Call infrastructure could be helpful: The authorities contact one of two or three hams that had been named before. Those hams get a JS8Call TRX that interfaces with their smart phone. The JS8Call TRX has an alarm buzzer and is battery powered. Group calls could be used to alarm people. Point-to-point contacts can be used to request contacts with more conventional ham radio means. In their stand-by mode these transceivers could be operated with a minimum of power and a very basic antenna. Consider a form factor like a portable radio.
I read the letter N2AA wrote and that you posted just now, and I saw a few days ago that Ria had stepped down. I wasn't sure why, and to be honest I still haven't investigated it, but I'll give you my take on the ARRL and some of its motives.
Their standpoint on "radio active hams" seems to be predicated on whether or not they are ARRL members, by using the math that most active hams are members of the ARRL. How could the ARRL determine how many "radio active hams" there really are? This is a non-starter for me, and I can see where this is going. This is about memberships and money. Because it seems to me, what David is really saying is, 'We helped make licensing easier, to obtain more licenses/memberships, but they get their license and we never hear from them again; evidenced by the number of licenses having increased, but the number of ARRL memberships hasn't increased along with them.' He's disguising his language "active" = member.
I've been a member since getting my license a few years ago, but I only donate for the advocacy of spectrum and the magazine. The ARRL is akin to the NRA and other lobbyist groups and organizations. Most importantly, the ARRL is a business, and makes decisions based on what businesses are about. Money. This idea that DEI is some path to more money is a disillusion that seems to be sweeping across the corporate landscape. "Go woke, go broke" is a common catchphrase that has some merit. The fact is, manipulating somethings natural course to effect the outcome leads to unintended consequences. The matter of diversity in ham radio is a complex system, just as the diversity issue in general. As a matter of course, the "problem" would eventually self-correct, as it's been doing for decades, and getting in there and turning knobs and pushing buttons isn't going to help.
Old white men making up the majority of ham radio is not a problem that needs fixed, and is not a result of some mechanism of oppression. As I see it, there is complete freedom and inclusion in who can obtain a license, and the rest is up to them. Yes, it would appear that there are "gatekeepers" that think they're the true essence of ham radio. But these folks need to be ignored, and for the most part they are. I've had to deal with them starting out, but I quickly realized that I need not worry about their opinions. It's not a fraternity, a guild, or a club. No one is hand-picked and there is no interview process. We're free to do what we want after getting licensed, with in the law of course.
To sum it up, the ARRL is looking for ways to pull people in, not for amateur radio's sake, but for their own. Looking to project inclusiveness as a rallying cry is the wrong route in my opinion. It's not genuine and it shows. They need to slow their roll when it comes to their outreach efforts and focus on lobbying. They continue to interject themselves into matters they have no business getting into and it's having a negative effect on the hobby. Just my opinion.