An independent newsletter about technological innovation in Amateur Radio, promoting Amateur Radio as (literally) a license to experiment with and learn about radio technology.
Zero Retries is a unique, quirky little highly independent, opinionated, self-published email newsletter about technological innovation in Amateur Radio, for a self-selecting niche audience, that’s free (as in beer) to subscribe.
Pseudosponsor - Dire Wolf “soundcard” AX.25 packet modem / TNC and APRS encoder/decoder
Request To Send
Engineers on the Brink of Extinction Threaten Entire Tech Ecosystems
New ARRL Radio Lab Will Inspire Your Ham Shack!
Beware “Signal Enhancement Setting” on Windows 10
ZR > BEACON
Zero Retries Sponsorships
Join the Fun on Amateur Radio
Closing The Channel
This issue of Zero Retries is pseudosponsored1 by Dire Wolf “Soundcard” AX.25 packet modem / TNC and APRS encoder/decoder. If you have the rare software chops and a background in Amateur Radio data (packet radio) communications, in my opinion, Dire Wolf is the most vibrant, worthy-of-your-efforts open source project in Amateur Radio Data Communications. Dire Wolf is led (primary contributor) by John Langner WB2OSZ. Notably, Dire Wolf has implemented two forward error correction systems - FX.25 and IL2P, which moves Amateur Radio Packet Radio into new capabilities.
Request To Send
Countdown to Digital Communications Conference 2022 - September 16-18, in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA: 1009080706 05 weeks… Countdown to DCC 2022 Paper submission deadline - September 1: ~08~07~06~05~04 ~03 weeks…
This week had some major (time consuming) and urgent tasks that constrained my time to work on Zero Retries. As I put the finishing touches on this issue just a few hours before publication time at 15:30 Pacific, I’m a bit wrung out from sitting in front of the computer most of this week. This weekend is projected to be two more gorgeous summer days here in Bellingham, WA, thus I’m declaring a moratorium from my usual temptation to sit in my office working on Zero Retries. This weekend will be for catching up on a bunch of physical chores, including the “special project” I hinted at a few issues ago.
Disclaimer - this story is only tangentially related to Amateur Radio (tied together, loosely, at the end of the story). If your focus is entirely Amateur Radio, skip to the next article.
The Register is a snarky, irreverent, sometimes humorous online publication, but sometimes it hits home, as it does with this piece.
Intel has produced some unbelievable graphs in its time: projected Itanium market share, next node power consumption, multicore performance boosts. The graph the company showed at the latest VLSI Symposium, however, was a real shocker. While computer science course take-up had gone up by over 90 percent in the past 50 years, electrical engineering (EE) had declined by the same amount. The electronics graduate has become rarer than an Intel-based smartphone. That part of the technology industry which makes actual things has always been divided between hardies and softies, soldering iron versus compiler, oscilloscope versus debugger. But the balance is lost. Something is very wrong at the heart of our technology creation supply chain. Where have all the hardies gone?
The entire article is worth reading. This situation has been known for decades now. In fact, the Raspberry Pi single board computers were created to address just this issue - declining interest in understanding actual hardware, rather than just learning software, with the hardware as an underlying abstract layer.
This issue is all the more poignant in the wake of the US The Chips Act of 2022 which allocates $54.2B for a number of programs relating to increasing the manufacturing of semiconductors in the US, including this Zero Retries Interesting item:
Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund: $1.5 billion through DOC National Telecommunications and Information Administration (“NTIA”), in coordination with NIST, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, among others, to spur movement towards open-architecture, software-based wireless technologies, funding innovative, ‘leap-ahead’ technologies in the U.S. mobile broadband market.
Just one problem comes to mind…
Where are they going to get all the highly talented people that will be needed to make this initiative a reality?
One of the hidden vulnerabilities of semiconductor fabrication is that it requires incredibly (practically unbelievable) high levels of quality control. Semiconductor manufacturing is totally binary; either you do everything perfectly, all the time, or the output of the semiconductor fabrication plant is junk. You really, really gotta know what you’re doing! In the US there simply hasn’t been that much demand for engineers for semiconductor fabrication… thus we don’t have many (demand vs supply). The US does make chips - Intel’s biggest US fabs are in Portland, OR! But most of the knowledge of cutting edge semiconductor fabrication is in Taiwan; they’re ahead of Intel these days.
Bringing it back to Zero Retries Interesting - where are we going to get the engineers that grasp wireless well enough to create “leap-ahead technologies” cited in the Chips Act of 2022?
In some ways, the US is holding its own on wireless technology. One stellar example is Starlink - satellites, ground terminals, and infrastructure units all designed and manufactured in the US (and, of course, all launched from the US). Another bright spot is Qualcomm, headquartered in the US. Motorola is still around, having distilled itself down to Motorola Solutions providing public safety two-way radio systems. Of course, there’s FlexRadio Systems who started from an Amateur Radio “hobby project gone horribly wrong” to a supplier of radio systems to the US government. And the US Department of Defense could not fight without wireless technology.
But, the US no longer makes cell phones. Maybe that’s OK. At least we design them in the US (mostly - Apple). It seems to me that if we (the collective we, as in a collective effort of the US technology industry, US government, academia, etc.) don’t want radio technology development and infrastructure in the US to be eventually ceded by default to China because of the “pipeline” of radio technology specialists slowing to a trickle. If we don’t want that, we gotta start taking the slowing “pipeline” of radio technology specialists seriously by investing in deep understanding, competency and significant numbers of radio technology specialists.
This isn’t the first time the US had such a crisis in underinvestment in technology education. One of the first was the Sputnik Crisis.
[President Eisenhower] also noted the importance of education for the Russians in their recent scientific and technological progress, and for America's response to the Russians. He remarked, “we need scientists in the ten years ahead... scrutinize your school's curriculum and standards. Then decide for yourselves whether they meet the stern demands of the era we are entering.”
Amateur Radio can help the lack of radio technology specialists by giving them a head start in understanding radio technology… if we can get them interested in Amateur Radio. How? Aye, there’s the rub. There are a lot of independent efforts doing so. Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) has been active in this area by providing a diversity of grants such as:
I’ll publish the results of the poll in Zero Retries 0060.
New ARRL Radio Lab Will Inspire Your Ham Shack!
As much as I criticize the ARRL for being on the trailing edge of Amateur Radio technological innovation, I really strive to be fair. Thus… this experiment / project of the ARRL to reimagine (and demonstrate) the “Amateur Radio Shack of the future / present” is, in my opinion, a worthy effort. It’s notable that the “reveal” of this experiment / project didn’t emerge as a staid, truncated text-with-a-few photographs article in QST (accessible only to ARRL members, and truncated by nostalgia and contest results) but as a vibrant “anyone can view” video.
This mode of operation (virtualized radios operated remotely via broadband Internet and computer) is becoming more common as many Amateur Radio Operators have to contend with Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that prohibit external antennas, rising HF noise levels in urban environments, and other constraints. Some Amateur Radio clubs are creating virtual stations that can be shared among club members to be remotely operated.
Of course, being an Amateur Radio Operator “of long experience” I have a few quibbles about the system shown in the video, like the stilted user interface of radio operations, especially HF radio operations, as “clunky” with merely a mouse / keyboard / display. Even just a knob that’s a USB peripheral, such as the FlexControl USB Controlled Tuning Knob can make radio operations much easier. I’m a fan of the dedicated radio console such as the FlexRadio Maestro radio control panel.
While setting up a new system yesterday, a brand new Dell Optiplex 7000 computer, we were having trouble getting UZ7HO HS_Soundmodem to decode reliably on 9600 packet using a DRA-50 sound card. The problem turned out to be an option in the Windows advanced sound settings under the Recording tab:
Image courtesy of Scott Currie NS7C
Do not enable this option (and it is enabled by default)! I'm not really sure what it does, but it really messed up 9600 packet, and I suspect it would also affect Vara FM. I have checked multiple systems, but only found this option present on the Dell.
In a later message, NS7C clarified that this particular computer was using Windows 10, but that he expected this setting to also be present in Windows 11.
Stephen Smith WA8LMF added to this thread:
This has been a standard part of the Windows audio device settings dialogs since Windows Vista. “Signal Enhancements” applies various DSP (digial signal processing) to the input audio stream (Mic or Line-In).
The “Softies” seem to think that the only use for audio input in Windows is for voice applications such as Skype, Zoom, VoIP telephony, Speech-to-Text, etc. The “Signal Enhancements” reduce audio bandwidth, so AC hum, mechanical noises like electric motors, etc are less obvious. It tries to remove white noise such as wind blowing on mics, or rushing air from fans. It also applies a level-triggered audio gating so low-level background noises such as traffic or household appliances don't get fed into your outgoing Skype or Zoom call audio when you aren't talking.
If you try to use the Windows audio inputs in the default mode (Enhancements ON) for music recording or ham soundcard apps, this hidden added audio manipulation absolutely mangles the audio-in. [This is similar to the DSP noise reduction in many modern transceivers that you are urged to turn off for digi modes.] High-frequency audio components like brushed drums or cymbals, the attack of plucked strings (guitars, pianos, etc) or the high-frequency components of the various beeps, warbles and squawks of ham digi modes are falsely identified as “white noise” to be removed.
Be default, every added audio-input device added to Windows (such as Signalinks, internal “sound cards” in newer transceivers, etc) will also have the signal-mangling “Enhancements” enabled. It's up to you to turn this nuisance off for each new device.
I’ve noted previously that the multiplicity of audio settings on Windows are a minefield of ways to trip up Amateur Radio data communications on Windows.
ZR > BEACON
Indian Schoolgirls’ Satellite Launched with 75 Experiments (from Amateur Radio Newsline Report 2336 for Friday August 5th, 2022) A satellite built by girls in India has been stirring some excitement. … A small satellite built by 750 schoolgirls in India, will be on board for the maiden flight of the Indian Space Research Organization's Small Satellite Launch Vehicle this month. The students were mentored by SpaceKidz India in the construction of this 8-kilogram satellite. It carries 75 small experiments, a camera to study solar panels in space and a variety of long range communications transponder experiments. The satellite also has a messaging system for amateur radio operators. Although this is not the first student satellite built with the help of SpaceKidz India, this one is [different] because it carries its own power systems and batteries to power an anticipated six-month-long orbit. This satellite is not, of course, the main payload for the launch vehicle. The rocket will also be carrying the Microsat 2A, which is designed to assist in the mapping of parcels of land. At the time Newsline went to production, the launch was scheduled for August the 7th. … More info about AZAADISAT and Space Kidz India: ”AZAADISAT” is a satellite mission with the ambitious vision to encourage Government school children (from economically weak backgrounds) with the basic understanding and knowledge of space and tutor them to build a small experiment and launch it to the edge of space through a “Balloon Satellite” or through an “Orbital Satellite”. … Unfortunately, AZAADISAT was lost during the launch phase on August 6, 2022: India’s new SSLV rocket fails in first launch The inaugural launch of India’s Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV) failed to reach orbit Aug. 6 when the rocket’s kick stage malfunctioned. The three-stage vehicle, capable of placing up to 500 kilograms of payload to a 500-kilometer low Earth orbit, lifted off at 11:48 p.m. Eastern from Satish Dhawan Space Centre’s launch pad No.1, carrying the 135-kilogram Earth observation satellite EOS-02 built by the Indian space agency ISRO and an eight-kilogram cubesat AzaadiSAT, made by Indian students. … ISRO announced that the [Velocity Trimming Module (VTM)] had malfunctioned, deploying the satellites into an elliptical orbit of 76 by 356 kilometers, instead of the intended circular orbit of 356 kilometers. “Satellites are no longer usable,” ISRO stated, and likely reentered over the Pacific Ocean. … It’s a disappointing, but poignant lesson that Space… especially launches leaving Earth’s gravity well… is hard. You either get everything right, or you lose the rocket and payload. For the girls in India that built AZAADISAT, I hope they can absorb the “lesson” that it’s not how many times you get knocked down, it’s how many times you get back up! I hope someone funds AZZAADISAT 2, and quickly.
Zero Retries Sponsorships
The Zero Retries sponsorship model is evolving, but it’s initially inspired by the Daring Fireball blog’s sponsorship model (other than this sponsorship cost). Some initial points:
Sponsorship of Zero Retries is only available to “Zero Retries Interesting” companies, organizations, individuals, and projects. Ideally, a Zero Retries sponsor is involved in Amateur Radio, but that’s not an absolute requirement. If an individual or company would like to sponsor Zero Retries, but prefer to remain anonymous, that’s acceptable, but the “Zero Retries Interesting” criteria still apply.
Sponsorships are limited to a brief mention in Zero Retries - a few sentences at most (but prominently displayed). Example - “WhizzyPacket is proud to sponsor this week’s Zero Retries”. More targeted sponsorship messages are acceptable, such as “WhizzyPacket is looking for a few good engineers - click here”.
A sponsorship is for one weekly issue of Zero Retries and is exclusive - one sponsor per week. Sequential sponsorships are available - as much as three months of sponsorship is acceptable. Longer than three months, let’s discuss it.
Lastly, although it kind of defeats the overt purpose of sponsorship, if a Zero Retries Interesting company, organization, individual, or project cannot afford to pay for a sponsorship, but wants / needs to “get the word out”, Zero Retries can probably work something out. In fact, if there are gaps in sponsorships, I’ll probably create some gratis sponsorship messages.
If you are interested in sponsoring Zero Retries, please reach out - it’s early days. More importantly, if you know of a company, organization, project, or individual that you think could / would / should sponsor Zero Retries, please point out Zero Retries to that entity.
Join the Fun on Amateur Radio
If you’re not yet licensed as an Amateur Radio Operator, and would like to join the fun by literally having a license to experiment with radio technology, check out Join the Fun on Amateur Radio for some pointers.
Closing the Channel
In its mission to highlight technological innovation in Amateur Radio, promote Amateur Radio to techies as a literal license to experiment with wireless technology, and make Amateur Radio more relevant to society in the 2020s and beyond, Zero Retries is published via email and web, and is available to anyone at no cost. Zero Retries is proud not to participate in the Amateur Radio Publishing Industrial Complex, which hides Amateur Radio content behind paywalls.
My ongoing Thanks to:
Tina Stroh KD7WSF for, well, everything!
Pseudostaffer Dan Romanchik KB6NU for continuing to spot, and write about “Zero Retries Interesting” items on his blog that I don’t spot on my own.
Email issues of Zero Retries are “instrumented” by Substack to gather basic statistics about opens, clicking links, etc. I don’t use such information in any way other than seeing that most subscribers actually do read Zero Retries.
More bits from Steve Stroh N8GNJ:
SuperPacket blog - Discussing new generations of Amateur Radio Data Communications - beyond Packet Radio (a precursor to Zero Retries)
N8GNJ blog - Amateur Radio Station N8GNJ and the mad science experiments at N8GNJ Labs - Bellingham, Washington, USA
Thanks for reading! Steve Stroh N8GNJ / WRPS598 (He / Him / His) These bits were handcrafted in beautiful Bellingham, Washington, USA 2022-08-12
If you’d like to reuse an article in this issue, for example for club or other newsletters, just ask. Please provide credit for the content to me and any other authors.
All excerpts from other authors or organizations, including images, are intended to be fair use.
RE: Remote shacks and software. It seems like we hams are extremely software adverse, quite the opposite of the rest of the tech universe. When it comes to remote control we hams will go to incredible lengths to avoid having to come up with an original software solution. And the default for remote control is just using the same software, only without access to the physical radio. The authors of most of the software assumed it would be used in front of a radio, so actually controlling the VFO from the program is an afterthought. As I look over at my MIDI keyboard controller, my Shuttle Contour jog wheel and iPad, all superior (and inexpensive, compared to the Maestro) interface options, I have to wonder just why having to cobble together 10 different proprietary and insecure software components is necessary. This should have been solved years ago.
We hams could build control surfaces using Arduino or Raspberry Pi SBCs with all the switches, displays and encoders we need. Or just adapt MIDI control devices. Even if you're only going from one end of the desk to the other, imagine having access to all your favorite knobs without needing to dive into the menus. Or tunneling your iambic key to the hiltop site using MIDI over IP. Sure, it would probably have to deal with a lot of buffering and latency so might not be the best solution for contesting, but all the more reason to set up high bandwidth HAMNET nodes in your area. We already have a good VoIP solution with Allstar. We could probably have a better one if we would stop bickering about HTs too.
I had some hope that Icom might be better at remote control than they are, but the seem to be going backward. Windows only, no API, mystery to reverse engineer. Not at all ham friendly. With their current track record I'm not even considering their SHF radio, even though it is 100% remote controlled.
The bulk of the amateur radio operators that spend at least an hour per week (typically a net) are lacking in the deeper understanding on how the "radio" electronics work, let alone understand the software or how propagation works. I am not even talking about those who have a license but never operate a radio. The focus of the article is about the "electrical" engineering and not the software engineering of amateur radio. It was a huge shame when school radio clubs were shuttered in the 1960s for "budgeting" reasons. Nobody to act as an elmer for fresh young minds has led to a world where those older than my 62 years scoff at being an elmer to others. I have taught Tech and General classes since I was 33 and am still elmering new people, from the new Tech in their late 60s down to a 14 year old in Manhattan. Dust off the books, watch some technical videos and SHARE the knowledge with those who need it. That is how we look forward towards the future.
Zero Retries 0059
RE: Remote shacks and software. It seems like we hams are extremely software adverse, quite the opposite of the rest of the tech universe. When it comes to remote control we hams will go to incredible lengths to avoid having to come up with an original software solution. And the default for remote control is just using the same software, only without access to the physical radio. The authors of most of the software assumed it would be used in front of a radio, so actually controlling the VFO from the program is an afterthought. As I look over at my MIDI keyboard controller, my Shuttle Contour jog wheel and iPad, all superior (and inexpensive, compared to the Maestro) interface options, I have to wonder just why having to cobble together 10 different proprietary and insecure software components is necessary. This should have been solved years ago.
We hams could build control surfaces using Arduino or Raspberry Pi SBCs with all the switches, displays and encoders we need. Or just adapt MIDI control devices. Even if you're only going from one end of the desk to the other, imagine having access to all your favorite knobs without needing to dive into the menus. Or tunneling your iambic key to the hiltop site using MIDI over IP. Sure, it would probably have to deal with a lot of buffering and latency so might not be the best solution for contesting, but all the more reason to set up high bandwidth HAMNET nodes in your area. We already have a good VoIP solution with Allstar. We could probably have a better one if we would stop bickering about HTs too.
I had some hope that Icom might be better at remote control than they are, but the seem to be going backward. Windows only, no API, mystery to reverse engineer. Not at all ham friendly. With their current track record I'm not even considering their SHF radio, even though it is 100% remote controlled.
The bulk of the amateur radio operators that spend at least an hour per week (typically a net) are lacking in the deeper understanding on how the "radio" electronics work, let alone understand the software or how propagation works. I am not even talking about those who have a license but never operate a radio. The focus of the article is about the "electrical" engineering and not the software engineering of amateur radio. It was a huge shame when school radio clubs were shuttered in the 1960s for "budgeting" reasons. Nobody to act as an elmer for fresh young minds has led to a world where those older than my 62 years scoff at being an elmer to others. I have taught Tech and General classes since I was 33 and am still elmering new people, from the new Tech in their late 60s down to a 14 year old in Manhattan. Dust off the books, watch some technical videos and SHARE the knowledge with those who need it. That is how we look forward towards the future.